Sizzling:  Rutgers Trial  |  Teary-eyed Kristen Wiig graduates from 'SNL'  |  Joplin Rebuilds  |  What gave Robin Meade panic attacks?  |  Must-see: 6 pics of the solar eclipse

Best Super Bowl ads? Dogs, babies required

NEED TO KNOW
  • Doritos, 'Weego' ads getting rave reviews
  • Pets and babies seem to be the big winners
  • Losers? GoDaddy.com -- and the Patriots

Copy the text below to embed this video on your webpage:

Close
embed

We now know there are at least three ironclad Super Bowl truths: if your last name is Manning you have a good shot to go to Disney World, someone will do something "shocking" at halftime and if you want a buzzworthy Super Bowl ad be sure that it stars a dog. Or a baby.

The first two were proven easily during last night's Eli Manning-led, M.I.A. bird-bombing Super Bowl. And the last is being proven the morning after.

In a Super Bowl ad year with no real breakout hits, you'd have to say the big winner was the old standby of pets and babies.

Real-time reaction: The Super Bowl ads live-blog

Doritos' "Slingshot Baby" and "Man's Best Friend" commercials are topping a lot of recap rankings so far, as are Bud Light's "Weego" ad and Volkswagen's "The Dog Strikes Back." Pretty transparent four-legged theme going on there.

On USA Today's annual "Ad Meter," the two Doritos ads and "Weego" top the list followed closely by the Vanessa Williams-voiced "not naked M&M" ad and then, you got it, two others with dogs: Skechers' speedy pug and the Volkswagen spot.

Among the ads scoring well the morning after, but not starring dogs or babies: Kia's Motley Crue-soundtracked "dream" ad, Audi's vampire-killing headlights and Clint Eastwood's Chrysler ad, in which the gravel-voiced icon tells us "this country can’t be knocked out with one punch. We get right back up again -- and when we do the world’s going to hear the roar of our engines."

Of course as the New England Patriots know very well, all Super Bowls have losers. And in the big money world of game-day commercials, the largest flops so far seem to be the creepy-but-not-'funny creepy' Cars.com ad, Bridgestone's two efforts and anything involving GoDaddy.com. Yawn.

So what'd we miss? Which commercials do you think were $3.5 million well spent? And which were total wastes? Leave your comments below and let us know!

Join the conversation...

HLNtv.com welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.

Advertisement