By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Close X

Nancy Grace

"Nancy Grace" is television's only justice themed/interview/debate show for those interested in the breaking news of the day.

Jury foreman: AEG's actions didn't kill Jackson

  • AEG Live found not liable for pop icon, Michael Jackson’s, death
  • Jury foreman says not one shred of evidence that Dr. Murray appeared unfit
  • Jackson’s family not legally entitled to billions of dollars in lost earnings
Jury foreman: AEG's actions didn't kill Jackson

Jackson jury foreman: ‘Conrad Murray unethical’

Jackson verdict read aloud, confusion ensues

Jackson verdict read aloud, confusion ensues

The jury has spoken in the wrongful death trial launched by members of Michael Jackson’s family, finding on Wednesday that Jackson’s concert promoter AEG Live is not liable in the pop star’s 2009 death.

Jackson’s mother Katherine and his three children--Prince, Paris and Blanket--sought $1 billion to $2 billion from AEG Live, claiming the company was partly to blame for the loss of money they say Jackson would have earned had he not died of a drug overdose.

Jury foreman Gregg Barden told HLN's Nancy Grace that while the jury agreed that AEG Live hired Jackson’s longtime personal physician, Dr. Conrad Murray--currently incarcerated for his role in Jackson’s death--they concluded the company had no reason to see Murray as unfit.

Murray was convicted in 2011 of involuntary manslaughter for overdosing Jackson with Propofol, a surgical anesthetic injected into Jackson’s body in efforts to treat insomnia. He was sentenced to four years in jail, but he is scheduled to be released later this month.

“I guess you have to understand they didn`t just throw us in the room and say, tell us was AEG liable or not,” Barden said hours after Wednesday's verdict was read.

After listening to five months of testimony in the civil trial, jurors were asked to answer a series of specific questions that would ultimately determine whether AEG Live was negligent in hiring, retaining or supervising Murray.

“We really didn`t say that Conrad Murray was fit,” Barden told Grace. “He was hired to be a general practitioner for Michael Jackson.”

“And to look at the definition of 'fit and competent'…all his licenses were intact," Baden added. "He had gone to a legitimate school. He had passed all of his doctor board exams. So he was fit and competent to be a general practitioner was the way we felt,” he said.

The jury also considered that Murray had no record of malpractice.

“You could have checked him out six ways to Sunday and there were no complaints there,” Barden said.

According to Barden, jurors recognized that, in hindsight, Murray failed to perform his duties.

“Nobody knew that he was unethical and would pump Michael Jackson full of Propofol,” he said.

“There was not one shred of evidence presented over five months to back up the fact that AEG could have known Conrad Murray was doing that.”

Barden said the jury was not asked to evaluate the quality of Murray’s care.

“Now, was he unethical? You bet, because he went beyond what he was supposed to be," Barden said. "So maybe had the word unethical been in there as opposed to unfit, I think the decision could've gone the other way.” 

Join the conversation... welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.
Will Conrad Murray ever treat another patient?
Michael Jackson | See all 145 items Will Conrad Murray ever treat another patient?